Preview

Economic Systems

Advanced search

Adve r tising flows as an institution of spatial development: disparity diagnostics and a regulatory model for integrating small and medium-sized businesses in Russia

https://doi.org/10.29030/2309-2076-2026-19-1-24-34

Abstract

Advertising flows as an economic institution shaping the spatial organization of markets in the digital economy. To develop a system for regulating advertising flows aimed at levelling the conditions for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to access advertising resources in order to ensure the unity of the economic space (UES) of Russia. An interdisciplinary approach is used, synthesizing theories of new economic geography, institutional economics, polarized development and the concept of «space of flows». The empirical part includes statistical analysis of Rosstat and AKAR data (2021–2025), comparative legal analysis of regional regulations, mapping, and a survey of SME representatives.
The hypothesis about the existence of a stable hierarchical structure of advertising markets in Russia («core – semi-periphery – periphery»), reproducing the general economic differentiation, is confirmed. It is established that the key determinants of disparities are not only economic but also institutional factors. Limited access of SMEs to advertising resources is a significant barrier to their interregional expansion, which fragments the economic space.
A targeted regulatory system has been developed, including measures to harmonize regulations, create a federal digital platform-aggregator of advertising resources, introduce financial support mechanisms for SMEs, and form a unified communication framework of the market. The implementation of the proposed measures can reorient advertising flows from the plane of differentiation to the plane of integration. The results of the study can be used by public authorities in the development and implementation of regional and industrial policies aimed at reducing spatial inequality and supporting SMEs.

About the Author

D. A. Shevchenko
Russian State Social University
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Shevchenko – doctor of economic sciences, professor, expert at the Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry

Moscow



References

1. Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.

2. Kiriya I.V., Vartanova E.L., Dunas D.V. Digital Environment of Russian Regions: Communication Aspects. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya = Monitoring of Public Opinion. 2014;(5):3-15. (In Russ.).

3. Savchenko A.B., Borodina T.L. Digital Potential of Russian Regions. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2024;20(4):157-178. DOI 10.14530/se.2024.4.157-178. (In Russ.).

4. Parshina V.S., Marushak T.B. Formation of Conditions for the Development of the Transport Sphere on the Basis of Training of Specialists at the University. Transportation Research Procedia: 12, Irkutsk-Krasnoyarsk, 06–08 октября 2021 года. Irkutsk-Krasnoyarsk, 2022. P. 65–69. DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2022.01.011. EDN GCJRXI.

5. Shevchenko D.A. Integrated Marketing Communications: Professor D.A. Shevchenko's Model. Reklama: teoriya i praktika = Advertising: Theory and Practice. 2024;(1):8-13. EDN FSHGSU. (In Russ.).

6. Thünen J. H. von. The Isolated State in Business on Land Use and National Economy. Hamburg: Perthes, 1826.

7. Weber A. Over the Standard of Industry. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1909.

8. Williamson O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985.

9. Krugman P., Fujita M. The New Economic Geography: Past, Present and the Future. Papers in Regional Science. 2004;83:139-164. DOI 10.1007/s10110-003-0180-0.

10. Granberg A.G. Strategy for territorial socio-economic development of Russia: from idea to implementation. Voprosy ekonomiki = Economic issues. 2001;(9):9-15. EDN MZYTKH. (In Russ.).

11. Shumakova O.V., Kryukova O.N. New transaction costs and global digitalization. Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Science of Man: Humanitarian Research. 2020;14(3): 189-197. DOI 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2020.14.3.23. (In Russ.).

12. Perroux F. Note on the notion of growth pole. Économie appliquée. 1955;8:307-320.

13. Myrdal G. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co., 1957.

14. Melnikova L.V. «Core-Periphery» and Peripherality in Regional Science. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2024;20(1):144-162. DOI 10.14530/se.2024.1.144-162. (In Russ.).

15. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

16. Shastitko A.E. New Institutional Economic Theory. 4th ed. Moscow: TEIS, 2002. (In Russ.).

17. Bardal A.B. Institutional Transformation of the Economy: Rules for Effective Policy. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2023;19(4):196-200. DOI 10.14530/se.2023.4.196-200. EDN CNXTOU. (In Russ.).

18. Gorodnova N.V. Development of the Digital Economy: Theory and Practice. Voprosy innovacionnoj ekonomiki = Issues of Innovative Economics. 2021;11(3):911-928. DOI 10.18334/vinec.11.3.112227. (In Russ.).

19. Ponomarev A.A. Russia’s Economic Space and Its Macroeconomic Proportions: Methodological Issues. Ekonomicheskie sistemy = Economic systems. 2025;18(1):39-49. DOI 10.29030/2309-2076-2025-18-1-39-49. EDN YBBCLH. (In Russ.).

20. Castells M. The Power of Communication. 4th ed. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2023. (In Russ.).

21. Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2001;10(4):945-974. DOI 10.1093/icc/10.4.945.

22. Zarkovich A.V. Theories of Innovative Development: The Concept of Regional Innovation Systems. Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniya = Humanitarian Scientific Research. 2013;6. URL: https://human.snauka.ru/2013/06/3404. (In Russ.).

23. Tatarkin A.I., Sukharev O.S., Strizhakova E.N. Schumpeterian Economic Theory of Industrial Policy: The Influence of Technological Structure / A. I. Tatarkin. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj teorii = Journal of Economic Theory. 2017;(2):7-17. EDN ZDMVJJ. (In Russ.).

24. Kapelyuk S.D., Karelin I.N. Demand for digital skills in Russia: regional differences. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economy. 2023;19(1):70-92. DOI 10.14530/se.2023.1.070-092. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Shevchenko D.A. Adve r tising flows as an institution of spatial development: disparity diagnostics and a regulatory model for integrating small and medium-sized businesses in Russia. Economic Systems. 2026;19(1):24–34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29030/2309-2076-2026-19-1-24-34

Views: 22

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2309-2076 (Print)