Composite index assessing the contribution of innovation infrastructure to regional economic security: essence and calculation methodology

The paper puts forward an indicative composite index measuring the contribution of innovation infrastructure to a region’s economic security (the IIESR index) and provides its methodological grounding. It does not assess particular regions: what it delivers is a reproducible calculation algorithm. The need for such a tool stems from the fact that the appraisal of innovation-infrastructure institutions and the indicator apparatus of regional economic security have so far evolved separately. The core of the proposed solution is a two-contour system of reference points. Where a substantive safety threshold exists – budgetary payback or a ceiling on the unit cost of a job – the comparison is made against that threshold; where no such norm exists (shares in GRP and employment, productivity, resident diversity), the indicator is set against an external development benchmark drawn from nationally representative data. Both reference types are fixed in advance and are not recomputed when the sample changes, which keeps the assessment indicative in meaning and comparable across years. The index is built along the stages of the OECD/JRC handbook. Block weights are fixed: equal weights as the baseline and analytic-hierarchy-process weights, with a consistency check, as an expert alternative; sample-dependent weighting is rejected. The algorithm’s stability is examined on a conditional example through a simultaneous uncertainty analysis (Monte Carlo) and a variance-based sensitivity analysis of the zones with respect to normalization, weights, and the aggregation method. Validation on a real sample of regions is identified as the next step. 

1. Amosov A.I. On goal-setting and the strategy for ensuring technological sovereignty. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost = Economic Security. 2024;7(3):693-718. (In Russ.). URL: https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.7.3.120766. (In Russ.).

2. Afanasev A.A. Technological sovereignty: essence, goals and mechanism of achievement. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki = Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2025;15(2):469- 488. URL: https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.15.2.122986. (In Russ.).

3. Report on the results of the functioning of special economic zones for 2024. Moscow : Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, 2025. URL: https://www.economy. gov.ru/. (In Russ.).

4. Senchagov V.K., ed. Economic security of Russia: A general course : textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow : Delo, 2005. 896 p. (In Russ.).

5. Mityakov S.N., Nazarova E.A. Empirical analysis of economic security short-term indicators. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost = Economic Security. 2023;6(3):849-864. URL: https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.6.3.118238. (In Russ.).

6. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD, European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Paris : OECD Publishing, 2008. 162 p.

7. Saisana M., Saltelli A., Tarantola S. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A. 2005;168(2):307-323. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.x.

8. Asheim B.T., Gertler M.S. The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In: The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 291–317.

9. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1980. 287 p.

10. Mityakov E.S., Ladynin A.I. Methodological tools for the integrated assessment of socioeconomic systems on the example of Russian regions’ scientific and technical security indicators. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost = Economic Security. 2022;5(2):473-490. URL: https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.5.2.114409. (In Russ.).

11. Ladynin A.I. The concept of ensuring the scientific and technological security of Russia. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost = Economic Security. 2024;7(9):2279-2290. URL: https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.7.9.121732. (In Russ.).

12. Nazarova E.A. Operational monitoring of Russia’s economic security. Cand. econ. sci. diss.: 5.2.3. Nizhny Novgorod : Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University n.a. R. E. Alekseev, 2024. (In Russ.).

13. Karavaeva I.V., Lev M.Yu. Economic security: Technological sovereignty in the system of economic security in modern Russia. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost = Economic Security. 2023;6(3):905-924. https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.6.3.118475. (In Russ.).

14. Karavaeva I.V., Lev M.Yu. Economic security of Russian regions. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost = Economic Security. 2024;7(9):2305-2330. URL: https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.7.9.121743. (In Russ.).

15. Ustinova L.N., Mukharramova E.R., Vays M.E. Russia’s economic security: Nature and trends. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Creative Economy. 2024;18(11):3235-3250. URL: https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.18.11.122098. (In Russ.).

16. Saradzheva O.V. Development of the institutional system for ensuring the economic security of the regions of the Russian Federation. Dr. econ. sci. diss.: 5.2.3. Moscow : Market Economy Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2024. (In Russ.).

17. Isakov A.S. Improving the toolkit for monitoring the economic security of Russian regions. Cand. econ. sci. diss.: 5.2.3. Moscow : Market Economy Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024. (In Russ.).

18. Report on the results of the expert-analytical activity assessing the effectiveness of preferential regimes in 2019–2021. Moscow : Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, 2022. URL: https://ach.gov.ru/. (In Russ.).

19. Report on the results of the control activity assessing the effectiveness of the functioning of special economic zones. Moscow : Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation. 2017. URL: https://ach.gov.ru/. (In Russ.).

20. Korotina N.Yu., Deeva V.P. Assessing the performance of industrial production special economic zones. Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i menedzhment = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Economics and Management. 2024;18(4):46-61. URL: https://doi.org/10.14529/em240404. (In Russ.).

21. Dubinina P.M., Demidova L.G. Methodology for assessing the performance of a technopolis. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki = Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2024;14(3):865- 882. URL: https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.14.3.121383. (In Russ.).

22. Glezman L.V., Isaev S.Yu., Urasova A.A. Innovation infrastructure of the region in the new economic reality. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Creative Economy. 2022;16(12):4605-4620. URL: https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.16.12.117165. (In Russ.).

23. Greco S., Ishizaka A., Tasiou M., Torrisi G. On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Social Indicators Research. 2019;141(1):61-94. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9.

24. Mazziotta M., Pareto A. Methods for constructing composite indices: One for all or all for one? Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica. 2013;67(2):67-80.

25. Becker W., Saisana M., Paruolo P., Vandecasteele I. Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap. Ecological Indicators. 2017;80:12-22. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.056.

26. Bulatenko M.A. Content analysis of dissertations on economic security. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost = Economic Security. 2022;5(4):1247-1272. URL: https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.5.4.115248. (In Russ.).

27. Labour and employment in Russia. 2023: Statistical compilation. Moscow : Rosstat, 2023. 180 p. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/. (In Russ.).

28. Annual report of the special economic zone «Technopolis Moscow» for 2024. URL: https://ar2024.technomoscow.ru/. (In Russ.).

29. Results of activities for 2024: Official website of JSC «Technopark of Novosibirsk Akademgorodok» (Academpark). URL: https://academpark.com/. (In Russ.).

30. Special economic zone «Innopolis»: Results of 2024. Innopolis : Official website. URL: https://innopolis.ru/. (In Russ.).